brand logo

Shishyathwa: Not during Covid, not ever!

18 Oct 2020

By Dr. Nicholas Ruwan Dias and Niresh Eliatamby Last Sunday, hundreds of thousands of little children were put at risk by forcing them to sit for the Grade Five Scholarship Exam, during the middle of the worst outbreak in Sri Lanka of the deadliest pandemic to challenge mankind in more than a century. A few days before that, a male teacher was arrested for sexually abusing four six-year-old girls, when their parents sent them for individual tuition classes for the same Scholarship Exam that they would sit in four years’ time. Meanwhile, employers throughout Sri Lanka have been lamenting for decades that graduates and Advanced Level (A/L) and Ordinary Level (O/L)-qualified young persons possess few skills for employment. Private and state sector vocational training institutes are filled with hundreds of thousands of youngsters who learnt little in school, despite having good A/L and O/L results. Thus, large numbers of Sri Lankan youth spend their most productive years outside the job market. The present Sri Lankan educational system, which is focused on A/L and O/L, does not allow children to think and unleash their potential to build up their own future in an innovative, systemic way. We have an illusion that our kids are advanced in emerging technologies, but their knowledge is more often just imaged on past papers and they know little of technology. The extraordinary operation of sending children for an exam during Covid underlined the unhealthy attitude towards education in this country, where success in non-innovative exams are deemed to be the yardstick of academic success, despite much of the world moving away from such an antiquated system. Although there was significant grumbling about the holding of the “Shishyathwa” and other exams, many parents nonetheless felt that they had little choice but to put lives at risk and have children take their exams. Parrot education Sri Lanka’s current method of education fails children by teaching them as one teaches parrots, not realising that the education system does not inspire or motivate children to think, reason, and activate their capacity for shaping their future. Sri Lankan teens are taught to learn the parrot way for their O/L and A/L exams, which was once considered a "gold standard" for intelligence testing. School teachers and tuition gurus are using marking schemes published on examination boards' past papers to prepare children in order to be able to replicate answers without understanding subjects in detail. Background The education sector in Sri Lanka has grown rapidly over the past decade, but the standard of learning remains unimaginative and misguided. Quality education is more critical than ever in an increasingly knowledge-based world economy. Education must be aimed at encouraging and building children. The call for increased investment in education has been growing since independence, but the issue of its education policy continues to be addressed by an independent Sri Lanka even over six decades after. Distorted national goals in this critical sector indicate low levels of learning. Sri Lanka does not promote innovative thinking by emphasising rote learning and its strict evaluation system. There are flaws in the rote teaching approach. Research has found that the mathematics, science, and reading abilities of primary and secondary school students have regressed. It has not only long-term consequences, but is an institutionalised procedure as a detrimental rote method. The students, who read, mingle with people, and experience society, culture, and places in which they move, become well rounded. These all form their views and experiences on their educational journey. The less they experience, the less they explore and the more closed their minds remain. Tuition masters’ “tuition kada”  Mass classes of over 1,000 students are quite normal in cities and large towns across the country. Nugegoda, Gampaha, Kurunegala, Anuradhapura, and many other towns are known as “tuition towns” with students from many miles around flooding in for classes on Saturdays and Sundays. Even during Covid, tuition masters petitioned the Government to allow them to go back to these huge mass classes, and obtained a concession to have 50% capacity classes of 500 students! These tuition classes conducted for students of as early as Year 1, continue until A/L, and are an enormous financial drain for almost all parents. Poor grading system The grading system employed in Scholarship, O/L, and A/L exams simply rewards the vomiting out of answers crammed into students’ heads, for the most part. There is little scope allowed for creativity. This has led to Sri Lanka becoming a non-competitive nation globally. The way forward: Practical solutions
  • Replace the Scholarship, O/L, and A/L system with a credits-per-course-based system, where children are encouraged to continuously learn, as opposed to cramming and parroting
  • Such a system should include a diverse range of subjects up to the end of their schooling, including a wide choice of electives, to enable them to explore different areas and find what they are each talented to pursue
  • Replace the current O/L and A/L Z-score system of entry into universities and government jobs with a points system that recognises and rewards sports and extracurricular activities
  • Build a better society by giving additional points for activities that benefit society – social service, scouting, innovations, etc.
  • By giving points for sports, build a healthier and more competitive society
  • Outlaw mass tuition classes. Make teachers provide extra coaching for students of their own schools in the afternoons after regular school hours
  • Change the school hours to allow children to come to school by 8.30 a.m. and stay in school until 5.30 p.m., with the last two hours being for sports or extracurricular activities, or extra classes. That would allow parents to pick children up from school after work
  • Stop trying to reinvent the wheel, as Sri Lanka often tries to do and fails. Look at global best practices in education in countries that are leading the world in innovation, economic growth, science and technology, etc.
The Scholarship and O/L exams Of course, the Scholarship Exam and O/L serve one good purpose, in that they provide an opportunity for students in rural areas to enter the big schools. However, it is not the opportunity that must be reconsidered, but the manner in which the evaluative exercise is conducted through regurgitative exams. It would be far better to use different criteria for selection as outlined above. The global scenario: Key highlights
  • In all international student assessment programmes, Finland was a frontrunner
  • Sri Lanka is not examined under Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and is thus unsure of its student standards 
  Every three years in the world, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) analyses education systems, measuring the skills and knowledge of children aged 15 (and collaboratively to address challenges and financial learning) in science, reading, and mathematics. The PISA exam is conducted in 79 countries with 600,000 students, based on a two-hour test.  The PISA 2018: Top-rated countries Figure 1 shows the top PISA ratings globally for the countries with the best education systems. Primary education quality across the 2017/2018 country index Figure 2 shows the ratings for primary education. With an index score of 6.7, Finland had the world's highest elementary school rating in 2017. The index is one (low quality) to seven (very good). Switzerland, Singapore, the Netherlands, and Estonia have placed in the top five as the countries with the highest primary education standards. The first stage of formal formation involves basic knowledge and skills, such as math, reading, writing, and science, which have extraordinarily high student attendance rates in advanced economies. This allows young students to build a strong basis in education. Finland The principle of play-based learning is part of Finland's early education system. Students are not obliged to attend school until they are six. When the child turns seven, they give basic education. They will pursue a single structural education for the next nine years. They take extra steps to review and revise the curriculum to fulfil the needs of each individual. To further strengthen teachers and classrooms, the Finnish National Education Agency supports self-evaluation. Finland also does not provide national standard assessments, but measures learning performance. Free meals are another striking feature. The high school is divided into two general and technical courses.  
  • The school days are shorter (190 days a year) 
  • The education system of Finland has certain basic values 
  • Students can choose their educational direction
Finland consistently ranks among the world's education systems and is renowned for having no systems of banding. Students are taught in all classes, regardless of their skills. The difference between the poorest and the richest is also the lowest. Finnish schools have only one compulsory examination at the age of 16 as well as very little homework. Students may select their schedules in general education, and they must eventually attend an admission test. These ratings are taken into account in the university applications. Training is based on work, while studying and apprenticeships go together. After that, students gain competence-based skills. High school is also totally open to higher education. Only books, transport, and other school supplies must be paid for by the students.  Denmark Education remains one of the primary pillars of the Danish welfare state and has helped make the citizens and workers in Denmark relatively harmonious. The Danish education system seems reasonably cohesive, systematic, and comparable in international contrast. It is mainly state-funded and regulated. Schools are almost entirely governed by the State through the Ministry of Education, with recognition by the competent authorities in further education and higher education. However, under public oversight and financing, the education system involves a variety of private institutions and special interest groups or associations participating in the education system. Singapore to replace GCE exams In 2027, the Ministry of Education will implement a new common national examination, which will replace the existing GCE Ordinary Level (O/L) and Normal Level (N/L) exams, thus replacing the subject banding system which will further replace the secondary school streaming. The proposed subject-based banding system would also require a new high school programme. Each topic is divided into three different levels: General 1 (G1), which refers to Technical, General 2 (G2) is Academic, and General 3 (G3) is referred to as Express. Students may take topics at various levels, depending on their skills. All students in high school will sit in 2027 for a general national examination and will have a general certificate, a list of completed subjects, and the regular subject band. This is because subject-based banding is a more versatile course. Teacher vs. technology The Fourth Industrial Revolution is a crucial test to the education system that focuses on the recitation of facts and measurement of formats exactly where people cannot compete with intelligent machines. In all our technological development, human creativity and imagination remain unparalleled. We should take advantage of this and give our young people the ability to make the most of their advantages. Research findings indicate that the teacher vs. technology technique has not been compatible with its hype and legitimate purpose. We must be cautious that technology alone may or may not revolutionise education. The most critical factor for the progress of the pupil will always remain teachers. Students must have the belief that they are interested in the future, a goal for which they should fight if they want to do well in school. Education should provide just the right amount of physical adventure and intellectual stimulation. Most successful are those methods that facilitate the treatment of teachers and students. The teaching and learning process is a voluntary act that cannot be replicated by machines and markets. Soft skills Soft skills are very important in this sense. When well taught, children can use soft skills to adapt to change faster, develop a deeper understanding of the world around them, and eventually advance to their selected area. Knowledge and skills can be technical, practical, easier to measure, and can enable a student to secure a job. But soft skills can allow them to adapt better and develop their careers. The fundamental fact is that physical, emotional, and social skills should be built and improved as a key to future prosperity and achievement. Soft skills are based on multiple experiences, interpersonal relationships, logical thinking and challenges, and the ability to create connections between complex ideas. Conclusion Sri Lanka is facing a national crisis in education, where our system has failed miserably – failed to provide our youngsters with a secure future and failed to provide the nation with a path to prosperity. We need to change the curricula and teaching practices all round, to focus less on rote or straightforward learning and more on the requisite skills, such as communication, reasoning, solving problems, critical thinking, and independence.   (The writers are Managing Partners of Cogitaro.com, a consultancy that finds practical solutions for challenges facing society and different industries. Dr. Dias is a digital architect and educationist based in Kuala Lumpur. He holds a BSc in Computing from the University of Greenwich, a Master’s in Computer Software Engineering from Staffordshire University, and a PhD from the University of Malaya. He is completing a second doctorate in Business Administration from Universiti Utara Malaysia [ruwan@cogitaro.com]. Eliatamby is a lecturer in marketing, human resources, and mass communications based in Colombo. He is an author and was formerly associate editor of a newspaper and editor of various industry magazines. He holds an MBA from London Metropolitan University and an LLM from Cardiff Metropolitan University [niresh@cogitaro.com])  


More News..