SL’s next president urged to give priority to human rights

Sri Lanka’s next president must put human rights at the heart of their policies, Amnesty International said today.

Ahead of next month’s presidential election, the human rights organization called on candidates to prioritize key human rights issues, including commitments on transitional justice made in the aftermath of the decades-long internal conflict.

“Human rights must be at the heart of the next Sri Lankan president’s policies. The authorities have made slow and limited but important progress when it comes to addressing human rights violations and abuses including the areas of truth, justice, reparations and guarantees of non-recurrence. To move on, the wounds of the past must be redressed. That is only possible if these gains are built upon,” said Amnesty International South Asia Director Biraj Patnaik said in a press statement.

Patnaik said, the families of the disappeared, the victims of torture and sexual violence, the people forced off their land, and others who have suffered grave human rights violations must not be forgotten. He added that the suspected perpetrators must be held accountable.

Amnesty International requests all presidential candidates, if elected, to  commit to repealing repressive laws, protecting civic space, abolishing the death penalty and protecting human rights including the rights to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association.

“In 2015, Sri Lanka made commitments to pursue truth, justice, reparations and guarantees of non-recurrence for victims of the 26-year-long internal conflict that ended in 2009. There has been dismayingly slow progress on these commitments over the past four years, but there have been some key advances, including the operationalization of Office of Missing Persons, the Office for Reparations, and the return of some of the land occupied by the Sri Lankan military.”Amnesty International  said.

“Amnesty International is calling on the next Sri Lankan president to build on these gains. The next president should push for the repeal of the notorious Prevention of Terrorism Act, one of main drivers of human rights violations to this day. It should be replaced by a law that meets international standards.”

“While tracts of civilian-owned land have been returned to their owners, many families are still protesting to get their lands back. The land that is still occupied by the Sri Lankan military should be returned and there should also be paid reparations for their decade-long dispossession,” the human rights body pointed out.

“More than a decade since the end of the conflict, Sri Lanka continues to live with its legacy. The next president must commit to a decisive break with the past, starting by repealing the notorious Counter Terrorism Act that enabled so many violations and by returning land to the people who rightfully own it,” said Biraj Patnaik.

According to Amnesty International, the rights to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association have been under assault in Sri Lanka over recent years. Laws that are supposed to protect human rights have perversely been used to punish people for exercising their human rights.

“The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) Act was supposed to enshrine into domestic law Sri Lanka’s international obligations. Instead, the law has been repeatedly abused to silence people for what they say or write. The Sri Lankan cabinet has also been considering the amendments to the penal code that will criminalize freedom of expression under the guise of combating ‘false news’.”

Amnesty International highlighted that the next Sri Lankan president must commit to ensuring that people are able to exercise their human rights freely and without fear of reprisals. This means upholding their rights to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association.

“Sri Lanka has seen a significant opening up of civic space over the past four years. But there are worrying signs of that same space shrinking. The next Sri Lankan president faces a test: Will they have the political will to allow people to speak, protest and organize freely or will they go the way of weak demagogues who choose to silence criticism by using fear?” said Biraj Patnaik.

“Sri Lanka has not executed anyone for more than four decades, but the death penalty remains on the books, including for drug-related crimes. Prisoners continue to languish on death row with the uncertainty that they may yet face a cruel and irreversible punishment.”

The next Sri Lankan president must consolidate the country’s positive record by introducing an official moratorium on executions and moving towards the abolition of the death penalty for all crimes.

“It is about time that Sri Lanka joins most of the world’s countries in decisively turning its back on this ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading of punishment. The death penalty is not a uniquely effective deterrent against crime and it violates the most fundamental right of all, the right to life,” said Biraj Patnaik.

According to the Amnesty International, a worrying trend over recent years has been a rise in anti-Muslim violence in Sri Lanka. In the wake of the Easter Sunday massacre, where hundreds were killed in churches and hotels in different parts of Sri Lanka, violent mobs unleashed their rage against Sri Lankan Muslims and refugees and asylum seekers from Muslim-majority countries.

The attacks follow similar violence in 2018, 2017 and 2014, when armed mobs attacked and torched Muslim-owned homes, businesses and places of worship. These mobs included hardline Buddhist monks who took part in the attacks and incited violence against Muslims.

Sri Lanka continues to criminalize homosexuality using an archaic, colonial-era penal code. LGBTI people routinely face harassment and discrimination at the hands of the police and other state officials , Amnesty International pointed out.

“The next Sri Lankan president must represent all people living in Sri Lanka. That means standing up for the human rights of people from every background, regardless of their religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation or any other characteristic. It means protecting them from those who wish them harm and holding accountable anyone suspected of violating their rights,” said Biraj Patnaik.